RAUSP Management Journal - The UN Sustainable Development Goals and Management Theory and Practice
Autores
Nome
1 - Erika de Farias Lisboa ESCOLA DE ADMINISTRAÇÃO DE EMPRESAS DE SÃO PAULO (FGV-EAESP) - Administração
2 - Ricardo Corrêa Gomes ESCOLA DE ADMINISTRAÇÃO DE EMPRESAS DE SÃO PAULO (FGV-EAESP) - Departamento de Gestão Pública
3 - Cristina Castro-Lucas UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASÍLIA (UNB) - instituto de ciencias biologicas
4 - Ettore de Carvalho Oriol UNIVERSIDADE ESTÁCIO DE SÁ (UNESA) - Made
Reumo
Innovation is conceptualized as something new that can be a product, an idea, or a mechanism (Kahn, 2018). The concept of innovation can be seen in terms of results or process depending on the alternatives that this mode of use of production factors can provide to the production of goods. In the same sense, the Bioeconomy can also be considered concerning its potential as an element of coping with climate change, globalization, and economic crises (Grundel and Dahlstrom, 2016, Wassenhoven et al., 2020).
This research aims to identify how innovation and bioeconomy themes and their relationships are treated in articles published in scientific journals in the field of Applied Social Sciences.
Innovation is conceptualized as something new that can be a product, an idea, or a mechanism (Kahn, 2018). The concept of innovation can be seen in terms of results or process depending on the alternatives that this mode of use of production factors can provide to the production of goods. In the same sense, the Bioeconomy can also be considered concerning its potential as an element of coping with climate change, globalization, and economic crises (Grundel & Dahlstrom, 2016; Wassenhoven et al., 2020).
The authors suggest the combination of Bioeconomy and Innovation, as a phenomenon that involves the theory of organizations and public policy theories. Bioeconomy can be explained both in the aspect of the organizations that are using this new form of production and the need for government involvement in aspects of regulation and promotion. In this sense, this phenomenon still lacks other theoretical and methodological lenses for its understanding.
The literature review allowed us to infer that this field has many potentials to be explored in the Applied Social Sciences because the articles' focus has not been organizational theories.
Anghel, I., Siminica, M., Cristea, M., Noja, G. G., & Sichigea, M. (2019). Bioeconomy credentials and intellectual capital: a comparative modelling approach for the EU-13 and EU-15 [Article]. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 32(1), 2699-2722. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2019.1653212
Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809-1831.
John, P. (2013). Analyzing public policy. Routledge.
Kahn, K. B. (2018). Understanding innovation. Business Horizons, 61(3), 453-460.