Anais

Resumo do trabalho

Gestão Socioambiental · Estratégia e Sustentabilidade Corporativa

Título

Analysis of the Relevance of Ambidexterity for the Adoption of the Industry 5.0 Management Model

Palavras-chave

Industry 5.0 Ambidexterity Sustainability

Agradecimento: The author thanks the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) for the financial support provided through the Academic Excellence Program (PROEX), which enabled the development of this work during the Master's Program in Environmental Quality at FEEVALE University.

Autores

Júlio César Ramos

UNIVERSIDADE FEEVALE (FEEVALE)
Dusan Schreiber

UNIVERSIDADE FEEVALE (FEEVALE)
Serje Schmidt

UNIVERSIDADE FEEVALE (FEEVALE)

Resumo

Introdução

Industry 5.0 emerges as an evolution of Industry 4.0, focusing on human centricity, sustainability, and mass customization. This new paradigm proposes the integration of advanced technologies with social values, placing human well-being at the center of production decisions. Such a transition requires management approaches that reconcile innovation with efficiency, creating more resilient, adaptable organizations that are connected to contemporary challenges in the industrial sector.

Problema de Pesquisa e Objetivo

How can organizational ambidexterity contribute to the adoption of the Industry 5.0 management model? The objective of this study is to analyze, through a systematic literature review, the relevance of ambidexterity as a strategy capable of balancing innovation and organizational efficiency, providing a foundation for implementing more human-centered and sustainable industrial practices in the context of the transition from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0.

Fundamentação Teórica

The literature describes Industry 5.0 as human-centered, sustainable, and resilient, in contrast to the technology-centric focus of Industry 4.0. Organizational ambidexterity, in turn, refers to the ability to balance the exploration of new opportunities with the efficiency of existing processes. This strategy enables companies to innovate without losing stability, making it a key approach to implementing industrial models aligned with the principles of Industry 5.0.

Discussão

The data reveal that capabilities such as absorptive capacity, organizational learning, and innovation ambidexterity are fundamental for adopting Industry 5.0 practices. Ambidexterity emerges as a mediator between lean practices, digitalization, and sustainability. Moreover, factors such as leadership, organizational culture, and cross-sector collaboration are essential for enabling the balance between exploration and exploitation, positioning ambidexterity as a strategic enabler of industrial transformation.

Conclusão

Organizational ambidexterity proved to be essential for the transition to Industry 5.0, enabling the alignment of innovation and efficiency with a focus on human beings and sustainability. The analysis of publications between 2020 and 2024 demonstrated growing academic interest in the topic. Organizations that adopt ambidextrous practices tend to adapt more effectively to the demands of the new industrial model, fostering greater resilience, competitiveness, and alignment with contemporary social values.

Contribuição / Impacto

This study contributes by integrating the concepts of Industry 5.0 and ambidexterity, highlighting the importance of this approach in building more human-centered, sustainable, and innovative management models. The findings provide both theoretical and practical foundations for managers and researchers interested in organizational adaptation to new industrial challenges, reinforcing the role of ambidexterity in digital transformation with social and environmental responsibility.

Referências Bibliográficas

XU, X. et al. Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, v. 61, p. 530–535, 2021.
HASHEM, G. Adopting Industry 4.0 through absorptive capacity and innovation ambidexterity. BPM Journal, v. 30, n. 6, p. 1995–2024, 2024.
BELHADI, A. et al. Digital business transformation and ambidexterity. Supply Chain Management, v. 27, n. 6, p. 696–711, 2022.
GASTALDI, L. et al. Smart Technologies and ambidexterity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 174, p. 121187, 2022.
AGOTE-GARRIDO, A. et al. Manufacturing System Design in Industry 5.0

Navegação

Anterior Próximo